ADVERTISEMENT
Historically, the attendance of leaders at national rituals served a spiritual purpose: it affirmed collective belonging. Rituals are the glue that holds a community together, transcending law and market forces to provide a sense of shared identity. When a prominent leader rejects these rituals in favor of direct, digital connection, the cohesion of the community begins to fragment. We see a rise in populism that favors authenticity over ceremony, but without the structure of ceremony, the public square becomes a place of performance rather than responsibility. The danger is not found in the skill of the performer, but in the audience’s tendency to mistake visibility for purpose. True leadership is not measured by the timing of a post or the height of a trending topic; it is measured by consistency, moral clarity, and service.
Interestingly, the actual impact of these digital interruptions on the world is often negligible. As the statement noted, the posts did not affect the outcome of the game. The Seahawks won, the Patriots lost, and history proceeded unaffected by the flurry of tweets and Truth Social updates. This is a crucial reminder that much of what feels urgent in the digital sphere is ephemeral. The “illusion of impact” creates a state of constant anxiety, where people search for meaning in symbols because they lack stable moral anchors. Who attended the game, who stayed silent, and who offered a cryptic video become substitutes for deeper, more meaningful engagement with the issues facing the country.